Comcast Wants Justices to fix 9th Circ. Standard in Bias Suit



Zealous Representation
with Integrity


Contact Us Now


Free Consultation

JUSTIA
BAR
OCBA
Expertise 2020
Expertise 2021
Lawyers.com

plausibly suggests that race played any role in Comcast’s decision not to carry ESN’s networks, much less that race was a but-for cause of Comcast’s decision,” Comcast insisted.

Counsel and representatives for the parties did not immediately respond to requests for comment Friday. Entertainment Studios’ response is due in two weeks, and the case is set for argument in November.

The justices’ ultimate determination in Comcast’s case will undoubtedly make waves in a related racial bias suit that Allen’s production firm lodged against Charter Communications Inc., in which Allen contends Charter also refused to carry his studio’s channels because he’s African American.

Both cases were lodged in California federal court several years ago by Allen’s firm alongside the National Association of African American-Owned Media.

While a California federal judge shut down Allen’s case against Comcast in late 2016 — finding Comcast’s refusal to work with Entertainment Studios could’ve been based on legitimate business reasons — a separate judge in the same California court decided to let the Charter case move forward just a few weeks later.

In the Charter case, the judge concluded that “arguably racist” statements made by Charter executives combined with Entertainment Studios’ years of failed efforts to work with Charter supported Allen’s racial bias claims.

After two separate appeals, the Ninth Circuit found Allen’s claims can proceed against both broadcast behemoths in a pair of decisions released in tandem late last year. In the parallel rulings, the panel concluded that the “but-for” causation element wasn’t necessary, and that Allen’s firm need only show racism played a role in the decisions not to contract with him.

Charter lodged its own petition for a Supreme Court review in March, but the justices are still mulling that one over.

Comcast is represented by Miguel A. Estrada, Thomas G. Hungar, Douglas M. Fuchs, Jesse A. Cripps, Bradley J. Hamburger and Samuel Eckman of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

Charter is represented by Paul D. Clement, Jeffrey S. Powell, Judson D. Brown, Devin S. Anderson and William K. Lane III of Kirkland & Ellis LLP.

NAAAOM and Entertainment Studios are represented by Louis R. Miller, J. Mira Hashmall and David W. Schecter of  target="_blank"Miller Barondess LLP and Erwin Chemerinsky of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law.

The cases are Comcast Corp. v. National Association of African American-Owned Media et al., case number 18-1171, and Charter Communications Inc. v. National Association of African American-Owned Media et al., case number 18-1185, in the U.S. Supreme Court.

All credit to Anne Cullen of Law360. Additional reporting by Kelcee Griffis and Bonnie Eslinger. Editing by Connor Relyea


Contact Us

Free Consultation

(800-529-8825)


Practice Areas

Areas de Practica

Client Reviews
















"Integrity, competency, and compassion! Dimuth Amaratunga has represented me and counseled me in several matters over the last several years, and each time, I have benefited tremendously from his knowledge, his wisdom and his empathy. He is without a doubt an authority in employment law and personal injury. But most importantly, he has compassion and truly focused on getting the best result for his clients. I am a practicing attorney and I wholeheartedly recommend him and his firm!"


- David J.


View More


Submit a Law Firm Client Review

https://www.serendiblaw.com/comcast-wants-justices-to-fix-9th-circ-standard-in-bias-suit/?fsp_sid=223

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Disney’s $233M Wage-Theft Settlement Explained

Image
More than 11,000 american workers were impacted by a headline-making wage-theft case that led Disney to agree to a massive $233 million settlement. Stories like this highlight how questions about fair pay still shape the experiences of many americans on the job. Understanding your rights and responsibilities as an employee or employer could help you avoid major losses, protect your income, and navigate the real risks of wage violations. Table of Contents Disney’s Wage-Theft Settlement: What Happened Local Minimum Wage Laws in California Understanding the Grace v. Walt Disney Lawsuit Employee Rights and Employer Responsibilities Key Lessons for Workers and Businesses Key Takeaways Point Details Massive Settlement Disney reached a $233 million settlement over wage theft allegations affecting over 11,000 employees. Systematic Wage Violations The lawsuit highlighted Disney’s practices of manipulating time records to underpay workers across various departments. Importance of Compliance The ...
Read more

Sexual Harassment Claims and Arbitration in Orange CA

Image
More than half of chain store employees report experiencing some form of workplace harassment in their careers. This reality shapes not only daily life on the job but can also undermine safety and trust at every level. Understanding the real definition of sexual harassment, its many forms, and the rights each worker holds is key to building a safer, more respectful work environment for everyone. Table of Contents Defining Sexual Harassment In Chain Stores Types Of Sexual Harassment And Common Scenarios Understanding Arbitration Agreements In Employment Legal Framework In California Workplace Disputes Employee Rights And Responsibilities Explained Risks Of Arbitration Versus Court Litigation Key Takeaways Point Details Understanding Sexual Harassment Sexual harassment includes unwelcome sexual advances and creates a hostile work environment, legally prohibited in workplaces. Types of Harassment Recognize the two main types: quid pro quo and hostile work environment, to underst...
Read more

Whistleblower Protection

Image
Zealous Representation with Integrity Contact Us Now Free Consultation Whistleblower Protection Whistleblower Protection Attorneys in Orange County Employees who report illegal or fraudulent activity, as well as any other labor violations in the workplace, are protected by both federal and state law. These whistleblower protection laws are meant to make sure employers do not retaliate against an employee who is doing the right thing and coming forward in such a difficult position. Unfortunately, however, sometimes employers will still take illegal action against a whistleblower to punish them or discourage others from acting similarly in the future. If you have been subjected to retaliation after reporting misconduct or fraud at work, the Orange County whistleblower protection attorneys at the Serendib Law Firm can help you stand up for your rights. Please contact our office toda...
Read more